🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 remains arguably the deadliest – and significant – dates during multiple decades of conflict in the region.

Throughout the area where events unfolded – the images of Bloody Sunday are displayed on the buildings and embedded in public consciousness.

A public gathering was organized on a cold but bright afternoon in the city.

The demonstration was opposing the policy of internment – detaining individuals without legal proceedings – which had been put in place following multiple years of unrest.

Soldiers from the elite army unit killed 13 people in the neighborhood – which was, and still is, a predominantly nationalist area.

A specific visual became notably prominent.

Pictures showed a religious figure, the priest, waving a blood-stained fabric while attempting to defend a assembly moving a youth, the injured teenager, who had been killed.

Media personnel documented extensive video on the day.

Historical records features Fr Daly telling a journalist that military personnel "appeared to discharge weapons randomly" and he was "totally convinced" that there was no reason for the shooting.

The narrative of the incident was disputed by the first inquiry.

The initial inquiry found the soldiers had been attacked first.

Throughout the peace process, the administration set up another inquiry, in response to advocacy by surviving kin, who said the initial inquiry had been a whitewash.

That year, the findings by the inquiry said that generally, the paratroopers had discharged weapons initially and that not one of the victims had been armed.

The then head of state, the Prime Minister, issued an apology in the House of Commons – saying deaths were "improper and unacceptable."

Law enforcement began to examine the events.

A military veteran, identified as the accused, was prosecuted for killing.

He was charged over the deaths of one victim, twenty-two, and in his mid-twenties William McKinney.

The accused was further implicated of attempting to murder Patrick O'Donnell, additional persons, Joe Mahon, an additional individual, and an unnamed civilian.

Remains a judicial decision maintaining the defendant's privacy, which his lawyers have argued is necessary because he is at danger.

He testified the examination that he had only fired at individuals who were possessing firearms.

This assertion was dismissed in the official findings.

Evidence from the examination was unable to be used straightforwardly as proof in the court case.

In the dock, the defendant was shielded from sight using a protective barrier.

He addressed the court for the opening instance in court at a session in December 2024, to respond "not responsible" when the accusations were presented.

Kin of the victims on that day made the trip from the city to the courthouse daily of the trial.

One relative, whose relative was died, said they were aware that attending the trial would be painful.

"I can see all details in my mind's eye," the relative said, as we visited the main locations discussed in the case – from Rossville Street, where the victim was killed, to the adjacent the courtyard, where the individual and William McKinney were died.

"It reminds me to my location that day.

"I participated in moving my brother and place him in the ambulance.

"I experienced again the entire event during the testimony.

"But even with experiencing the process – it's still meaningful for me."